powerpc/64s: Include cpu header
authorBreno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Mon, 22 Oct 2018 14:54:12 +0000 (11:54 -0300)
committerSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:23:17 +0000 (23:23 +0100)
commita1b4eefaead678b64979758573af84fd354d4cba
treee9ce593b36259d4f921cba3741934e7a2343e368
parentea69952b3c2eb9c15731f85d59c9c1882c8fb13e
powerpc/64s: Include cpu header

Current powerpc security.c file is defining functions, as
cpu_show_meltdown(), cpu_show_spectre_v{1,2} and others, that are being
declared at linux/cpu.h header without including the header file that
contains these declarations.

This is being reported by sparse, which thinks that these functions are
static, due to the lack of declaration:

arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:105:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_meltdown' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:139:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spectre_v1' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:161:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spectre_v2' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:209:6: warning: symbol 'stf_barrier' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:289:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spec_store_bypass' was not declared. Should it be static?

This patch simply includes the proper header (linux/cpu.h) to match
function definition and declaration.

Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Gbp-Pq: Topic bugfix/all/spec
Gbp-Pq: Name powerpc-64s-include-cpu-header.patch
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c